On July 16, 2012, Attorney Baird filed with the court a Motion To Dismiss Second Substitute Information, and a Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Second Substitute Information. While the Motion runs to only three pages, the Memorandum with exhibits runs to well over two hundred pages. This package was hand-delivered to the Office of the State's Attorney at the Norwalk Court House and logged in at 12:53 PM, and courtesy copies have been sent via mail to the Magistrate (G.A. #20), care of The Chief Court Administrator, The Honorable Barbara M. Quinn, and "Hizoner Roy Bean" Bruce P. Hudock.
The Memorandum Of Law does an excellent job of laying out the ongoing abuse of power by the Norwalk Police Department and the Superior Court from the very beginning of this case on February 16, 2011, to date. Throughout the posts on this site, the case has been made repeatedly that the "judges" at the Norwalk Courthouse have had not justice, but the protection of the Norwalk Police Department and the City of Norwalk from the consequences of their unlawful actions. This Memorandum clearly and succinctly distills and illustrates that the court has pursued a strategy of stalling and evasion, and now outright denial of a trial and acquital by a jury of my peers needed to sue the City of Norwalk and the Norwalk Police Department for false arrest and illegal search and seizure.
Why is this significant?
What should be clear to the residents of Norwalk and the citizens from the abundant documentation to be found on these pages and at Connecticut Carry is that given the cozy relationship between the Norwalk Police Department and the Superior Court at Norwalk (G.A. #20), it is not possible to obtain justice if the cops or city see themselves threatened by the adverse consequences of their actions. In short, the Norwalk Courthouse is wholy owned by the Norwalk Police Department and the City of Norwalk, complete with pet judges and prosecutors; a Kangaroo Court!
The above-linked Motion and Memorandum Of Law, aside from the obvious, serve as the basis for the shattering of this cozy clique and the restoration of a fair and impartial court, both here at the Norwalk Courthouse and hopefully around the state. Make no mistake; the behavior of the Norwalk Police Department and the "judges" and prosecutors in the Norwalk Courthouse is by no means unique; it happens time and again in our cities and courthouses around the state, and is a blatant violation of our Rights under both the State and Federal Constitution. The cops and the State will use every trick in the book to circumvent those Rights.
It might also be of interest to the readers of these pages that the Motion and Memorandum will serve as the basis for a complaint against both "Hizoner Roy Bean" Bruce P. Hudock and "judge" Maureen Dennis with the Judicial Review Council.
This case has been bigger than me for some time, now. It's about justice for all citizens of Connecticut. We can't have liars runnng around making up stuff to arrest people, and we can't have courts covering for those liars. Citizens, cops and courts alike must, must abide by the same laws.
Our next appearance, ostensibly for a magistrate trial, is scheduled for July 30, 2012. Hmmmm... What does 'de novo' mean?